netdev - Re: ICMP packets - ll_temac with Microblaze

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4EF1EC28.90008@monstr.eu>
Date:	Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:24:40 +0100
From:	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	John Williams <john.williams@...alogix.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ICMP packets - ll_temac with Microblaze

Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mercredi 21 décembre 2011 à 14:28 +0100, Michal Simek a écrit :
> 
>> ok. Can you provide me any background why size should be setup by
>> size = SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(ksize(data));
>> and not to use size which is passed to kmalloc in __alloc_skb.
> 
> Its all about memory accounting (based on skb->truesize)
> 
> Prior to the patch, we could fool memory accounting because skbs claimed
> to use less memory than what they really used.
> 
> And crash machines eventually.
> 
> Now memory accouting is fixed, we probably need to change some points in
> the kernel, where we previously accepted a small skb, but not a very
> large one.
> 
> Since "ping" probably uses SOCK_RAW sockets, I'll try this one :
> 
> (We dont care of _this_ skb truesize, only on the count of previously
> queued packets)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> index 0da505c..a809a48 100644
> --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
> +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> @@ -1631,8 +1631,7 @@ static int packet_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
>  	if (snaplen > res)
>  		snaplen = res;
>  
> -	if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc) + skb->truesize >=
> -	    (unsigned)sk->sk_rcvbuf)
> +	if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc) >= (unsigned)sk->sk_rcvbuf)
>  		goto drop_n_acct;
>  
>  	if (skb_shared(skb)) {
> @@ -1763,7 +1762,7 @@ static int tpacket_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
>  	if (po->tp_version <= TPACKET_V2) {
>  		if (macoff + snaplen > po->rx_ring.frame_size) {
>  			if (po->copy_thresh &&
> -				atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc) + skb->truesize
> +				atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc)
>  				< (unsigned)sk->sk_rcvbuf) {
>  				if (skb_shared(skb)) {
>  					copy_skb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> 
> 
> 
> 

It doesn't work too.
It is possible to see this behavior on qemu. What about if I prepare you package with cross toolchain, rootfs
and you can add debug message where you want?

I have also tried ll_temac driver with ppc440 and behavior is the same.

Max FRAME_SIZE pass to netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align is 7966. For this value ping works.
(For ll_temac driver it is #define XTE_JUMBO_MTU 7948 from ll_temac.h)

Thanks,
Michal

-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel 2.6 Microblaze Linux - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html