[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111222.132024.2100751924070475608.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:20:24 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: Ian.Campbell@...rix.com
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] skb paged fragment destructors
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:33:36 +0000
> On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 19:28 +0000, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:02:18 +0100
>>
>> > No idea on this +2 point.
>>
>> I think I know, and I believe I instructed Alexey Kuznetsov to do
>> this.
>>
>> When sendfile() is performed, we might start the SKB with the last few
>> bytes of one page, and end the SKB with the first few bytes of another
>> page.
>>
>> In order to fit a full 64K frame into an SKB in this situation we have
>> to accomodate this case.
>
> Thanks David, that makes sense.
>
> However I think you only actually need 1 extra page for that. If the
> data in frag[0] starts at $offset then frag[16] will need to have
> $offset bytes in it. e.g.
> 4096-$offset + 4096*15 + $offset = 65536
> which == 17 pages rather than 18.
>
> The following documents the status quo but I could update to switch to +
> 1 instead if there are no flaws in the above logic...
Indeed, you're right. Please change this to 1 and document it, and we
can put that change into net-next, thanks a lot!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists