[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1324674615.10184.631.camel@denise.theartistscloset.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 16:10:15 -0500
From: "John A. Sullivan III" <jsullivan@...ritualoutreach.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SFQ on HFSC leaf does not seem to work
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 12:35 -0500, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 12:33 -0500, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 18:17 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > Le vendredi 23 décembre 2011 à 18:06 +0100, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> > >
> > > > Maybe I was not clear :
> > > >
> > > > netem currently uses a fifo queue, you cant change this, without
> > > > patching kernel.
> > > >
> > >
> > > An other way would be to patch sch_tbf, adding delay, if its all you
> > > want to do.
> > >
> > > (Or adding delay capability to ifb)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > <grin> that's just a little outside by skill set ;) - John
> >
> <snip>
> And I should mention seriously, that we are viewing our learning curve
> as something we will use in production so we'd like to accomplish our
> goals using stock distribution code. Thanks, though - John
<snip>
Should I guess that, from the flood of subsequent emails about patching
netem that it is not currently possible to do netem and hfsc/sfq on
ingress traffic using the currently available tools?
It's definitely netem on the ingress. When I run it on egress and
disable it on ingress, I do not have the problem. But, I see no what of
getting the netem traffic into or out of SFQ. Thanks - John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists