[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EF896F0.2090306@computer.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:46:56 +0100
From: Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@...puter.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: bhutchings@...arflare.com, kgudipat@...cade.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, adapter_linux_open_src_team@...cade.com,
rmody@...cade.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bna: Added flash sub-module and ethtool eeprom entry
points.
On 12/26/2011 04:10 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jan Ceuleers<jan.ceuleers@...puter.org>
> Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 13:02:27 +0100
>> Is it OK to hold the RTNL lock for that length of time?
> No, because it means that no network configuration of any kind can
> occur during this time.
>
> Backbone routers need to perform hundreds of routing table updates per
> second, even more during major route flaps. All of these would be
> blocked during your flash operation.
>
That's what I thought. Over to Krishna.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists