netdev - [PATCH 5/5] unix_diag: Report ack backlog info for listen sockets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4EFB1C48.7060407@parallels.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Dec 2011 17:40:24 +0400
From:	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] unix_diag: Report ack backlog info for listen sockets

I propose to reuse the MEMINFO bit and message for this, since it's

a) also 2 values
b) symmetrical to how inet diag reports the length

Is it OK, or is it better to introduce separate bit and message?

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>

---
 net/unix/diag.c |   10 ++++++++--
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/unix/diag.c b/net/unix/diag.c
index dbae8a4..ebec5fc 100644
--- a/net/unix/diag.c
+++ b/net/unix/diag.c
@@ -113,8 +113,14 @@ static int sk_diag_show_meminfo(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *nlskb)
 	struct unix_diag_meminfo *mi;
 
 	mi = UNIX_DIAG_PUT(nlskb, UNIX_DIAG_MEMINFO, sizeof(*mi));
-	mi->udiag_len = sk_wmem_alloc_get(sk);
-	mi->udiag_limit = sk->sk_sndbuf;
+
+	if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
+		mi->udiag_len = sk->sk_receive_queue.qlen;
+		mi->udiag_limit = sk->sk_max_ack_backlog;
+	} else {
+		mi->udiag_len = sk_wmem_alloc_get(sk);
+		mi->udiag_limit = sk->sk_sndbuf;
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 
-- 
1.5.5.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html