netdev - Re: [PATCH] skge: restore multicast rx filter on resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20111229.025611.2043166821951238153.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 29 Dec 2011 02:56:11 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	florz@...rz.de
Cc:	shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] skge: restore multicast rx filter on resume

From: Florian Zumbiehl <florz@...rz.de>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 07:48:50 +0100

> --- a/drivers/net/skge.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/skge.c

This file no longer exists in the current source tree.

All of the ethernet drivers have been moved to various directories
under drivers/net/ethernet

Please do not generate patches against older source trees.

And when I ask you to post a patch anew, please make it clean.  In
this case you replied to my email, added some unrelated commentary,
and then included the commit log message and the patch.

This is not the correct way to do things.  Post a fresh email, not a
reply, with a clean Subject line and the email body contents only
contain the commit log message and the subsequent patch.

If you don't do things the correct way, then the person applying your
patch has to do a lot of work editing things.  If you do it the right
way, adding your patch is very easy.

See:

	http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html

for more details
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html