[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111229161919.GA2948@hell>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:19:20 +0100
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>
To: Niccolò Belli <darkbasic@...uxsystems.it>
Cc: lartc@...r.kernel.org,
"netfilter@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Networking Developer Mailing List
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Announce] LARTC wiki available
* Niccolò Belli | 2011-12-29 10:37:41 [+0100]:
>> What about
>>
>> http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/networking/group
>
>I saw it, but I didn't like it because unregistered users cannot edit
>the wiki and even registered users need an invite. Also, it seems
>quite confusing, a traditional wiki is a better solution in my
>opinion.
Anybody knows that network stack lacks documentation - no doubt. Maybe a wiki
is an adequate concept (beside man pages and in Kernel docs). Everybody, not
restricted to kernel hackers, can edit documentation and add examples.
Maybe the netem wiki page at
http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/networking/netem
is a good example for a good documented subsystem.
But I don't like the idea to outhouse the existing wiki. Why two wikis? What
happened with the wiki server if you leave the university? So maybe the user
restriction on linuxfoundation.org should be changed? I strongly suggest to
keep to documentation as tightly as possible to linuxfoundation (or
https://www.wiki.kernel.org/).
Hagen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists