[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1325183780.2607.60.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:36:20 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>,
"John A. Sullivan III" <jsullivan@...nsourcedevel.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netem: fix classful handling
Le jeudi 29 décembre 2011 à 19:25 +0100, Hagen Paul Pfeifer a écrit :
> * Eric Dumazet | 2011-12-29 19:10:36 [+0100]:
>
> >I dont quite understand the question. The patch I posted is supposed to
> >fix the problem. What do you want to tell to the user ?
>
> I assumed that the patch makes it possible to replace standard tfifo?! Tfifo
> provides strict ordering, other qdisc's do not. So I thought if someone use
> netem rate|jitter with e.g. SFQ then this should be mentioned somewhere. E.g.
> "rate|jitter can only be used with tfifo qdisc". Correct me if I am wrong.
>
Current netem uses a single queue, default tfifo.
Then if you change this tfifo by SFQ, you lose tfifo, and netem doesnt
work at all.
I claim we cannot remove tfifo.
After my patch, you now have :
1) An internal mandatory tfifo queue, to fulfill time_to_send
requirements.
2) An optional qdisc (SFQ in your example), where packets are queued
once dequeued from tfifo at the right time (after netem delay/rate
respected), eventually a packet can finaly be delivered to device with a
_bigger_ delay than the one predicted in tfifo, because of trafic
shaping happening in this optional qdisc.
Full netem block :
+---------+ +--------+
-->>-enqueue--| tfifo |---->>>>--enqueue--| SFQ |-dequeue--->>>>>
+---------+ +--------+
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists