[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <804857E1F29AAC47BF68C404FC60A18402A7BC@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:28:37 +0000
From: "Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"gospo@...hat.com" <gospo@...hat.com>,
"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [net-next 08/11] e1000e: add Receive Packet Steering (RPS)
support
>-----Original Message-----
>From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 12:28 PM
>To: Allan, Bruce W
>Cc: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; netdev@...r.kernel.org; gospo@...hat.com;
>sassmann@...hat.com
>Subject: Re: [net-next 08/11] e1000e: add Receive Packet Steering (RPS) support
>
>From: "Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>
>Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:16:44 +0000
>
>> I was under the impression from recently accepted patches that the preferred
>> method for log/error message strings was to keep them as a single string
>> (rather than broken across multiple lines) for easy searching. Is that not
>> the case here?
>>
>>>>From ./Documentation/CodingStyle..."never break user-visible strings such as
>> printk messages, because that breaks the ability to grep for them."
>>
>> Do you still want this change?
>
>Fair enough, I rescind my request and this patch is fine as-is.
Okay, thanks Dave.
Bruce.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists