[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120103.170213.1542305105290211959.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:02:13 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, bruce.w.allan@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 07/11] e1000e: cleanup Rx checksum offload code
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:24:02 +0000
> On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 16:15 -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
>> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:00:12 +0000
>>
>> > On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 15:08 -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> >> From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
>> >> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 11:19:12 -0800
>> >>
>> >> > - __sum16 sum = (__force __sum16)htons(csum);
>> >> > + __sum16 sum = (__force __sum16)htons(le16_to_cpu(csum));
>> >>
>> >> Looks like a NOP. It's essentially "cpu_to_le16(le16_to_cpu(csum)" as
>> >> far as I can tell.
>> >
>> > Looks like a swab() to me...
>>
>> I don't see how it can be. It's effectively doing a 16-bit swap and
>> then a 16-bit swap again, which is a NOP.
>>
>> It's the same as "(__force __sum16) csum" and I bet if the code above
>> works, then this expression I'm suggesting will work too.
>
> In this part of the universe, network order is big-endian.
Indeed, you're right, therefore this is something like swab().
:-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists