[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201201040949.54985.hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 09:49:53 +0100
From: Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@...csson.com>
To: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>
CC: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
"jengelh@...ozas.de" <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
"netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"hans@...illstrom.com" <hans@...illstrom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] netfilter: Add possibility to turn off netfilters defrag per netns
Hello Jozsef
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 09:28:05 Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
>
> > In some cases it not desirable to have auto defrag.
> > Ex. in a cluster where packets can arrive on different blades.
> > In that case it is possible to use containers (LXC) and send
> > all fragments to one place where defrag is enabled.
> >
> > This patch makes it possible to turn off the defrag per network name space,
> > by setting net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_nodefrag to 1.
> > Both IPv4 and IPv6 is effected by this sysctl.
> > Default is 0 which is defrag.
>
> Conntrack assumes that the packets are defragmented and will drop any
> unfragmented one. So your patch results packet drops.
Hmmm, more work...
>
> Also, if you want to disable defragmentation then why don't you simply
> "mark" the packets with the NOTRACK target?
I don't think that will work since NF_IP_PRI_CONNTRACK_DEFRAG is -400
>
> Best regards,
> Jozsef
>
--
Regards
Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@...csson.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists