netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] netfilter: Add possibility to turn off netfilters defrag per netns

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1201041030450.23605@frira.zrqbmnf.qr>
Date:	Wed, 4 Jan 2012 10:32:14 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To:	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>
cc:	Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@...csson.com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	"netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"hans@...illstrom.com" <hans@...illstrom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] netfilter: Add possibility to turn off netfilters
 defrag per netns

On Wednesday 2012-01-04 10:03, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:

>On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 04 January 2012 09:28:05 Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
>> > 
>> > On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
>> > 
>> > > In some cases it not desirable to have auto defrag.
>> > > Ex. in a cluster where packets can arrive on different blades.
>> > > In that case it is possible to use containers (LXC) and send
>> > > all fragments to one place where defrag is enabled.
>> > > 
>> > > This patch makes it possible to turn off the defrag per network name space,
>> > > by setting net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_nodefrag to 1.
>> > > Both IPv4 and IPv6 is effected by this sysctl.
>> > > Default is 0 which is defrag.
>> > 
>> > Conntrack assumes that the packets are defragmented and will drop any 
>> > unfragmented one. So your patch results packet drops.
>> 
>> Hmmm, more work...
>> > 
>> > Also, if you want to disable defragmentation then why don't you simply 
>> > "mark" the packets with the NOTRACK target?
>> 
>> I don't think that will work since NF_IP_PRI_CONNTRACK_DEFRAG is -400
>
>Then change NF_IP_PRI_RAW so that it precedes NF_IP_PRI_CONNTRACK_DEFRAG. 
>The raw table should be made possible to completely override conntack and 
>defrag is implicit part of the latter.

We've been there (me in the thread even) - defrag is running before raw,
because otherwise you could not select packets based upon L4 
parameters for non-defrag in the first place:

	-t raw ... -p udp --dport 53 -j CT --notrack

Not that I overly care about whether defrag is before/after raw..

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html