[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1325794968.2748.6.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:22:48 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] net: pad skb data and shinfo as a whole rather than
individually
Le jeudi 05 janvier 2012 à 19:19 +0000, Ian Campbell a écrit :
> On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 17:46 +0000, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Le jeudi 05 janvier 2012 à 17:13 +0000, Ian Campbell a écrit :
> > > diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > > index da0c97f..b6de604 100644
> > > --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> > > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > > @@ -189,8 +189,7 @@ struct sk_buff *__alloc_skb(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > > * aligned memory blocks, unless SLUB/SLAB debug is enabled.
> > > * Both skb->head and skb_shared_info are cache line aligned.
> > > */
> > > - size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
> > > - size += SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
> > > + size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size + sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
> > > data = kmalloc_node_track_caller(size, gfp_mask, node);
> > > if (!data)
> > > goto nodata;
> >
> > Unfortunately this makes the frequently use part of skb_shared_info not
> > any more in a single cache line.
> >
> > This will slow down many operations like kfree_skb() of cold skbs (TX
> > completion for example)
>
> I've been toying with the following which moves the infrequently used
> destructor_arg field to the front. With 32 or 64 byte cache lines this
> is then the only field which ends up on a different cache line. With 128
> byte cache lines it is all already on the same line.
>
> Does that alleviate your concern? If so I can clean it up and include it
> in the series.
>
> Cheers,
> Ian.
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> index cbc815c..533c2ea 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -249,6 +249,11 @@ struct ubuf_info {
> * the end of the header data, ie. at skb->end.
> */
> struct skb_shared_info {
> + /* Intermediate layers must ensure that destructor_arg
> + * remains valid until skb destructor */
> + void * destructor_arg;
> +
> + /* Warning all fields from here until dataref are cleared in __alloc_skb() */
> unsigned char nr_frags;
> __u8 tx_flags;
> unsigned short gso_size;
> @@ -264,9 +269,6 @@ struct skb_shared_info {
> */
> atomic_t dataref;
>
> - /* Intermediate layers must ensure that destructor_arg
> - * remains valid until skb destructor */
> - void * destructor_arg;
>
> /* must be last field, see pskb_expand_head() */
> skb_frag_t frags[MAX_SKB_FRAGS];
Hmmm
Take a look at kfree_skb() and please list all skb_shared_info needed
fields, for a typical skb with nr_frags= 0 or 1.
If all fit in a single cache line, its ok.
If not, this adds a cache line miss in a critical path.
Also in transmit path, when an skb is queued by cpu X on qdisc, and
dequeued by another cpu Y to be delivered to device.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists