netdev - Re: ping6: why TTL instead of Hop Limit?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120107233304.GA618@hell>
Date:	Sun, 8 Jan 2012 00:33:04 +0100
From:	Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>
To:	Dan Luedtke <maildanrl@...glemail.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ping6: why TTL instead of Hop Limit?

* Dan Luedtke | 2012-01-07 19:07:03 [+0100]:

>I was just wondering why there is a TTL-field in ping6, although the
>corresponding field in the IPv6 header is called "Hop Limit". [1]
>
>Example:
>> ping6 -c 1 www.linux-ipv6.org
>> 64 bytes from 2001:200:dff:fff1:216:3eff:fea4:f9e9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=309 ms
>
>What I expected:
>> 64 bytes from 2001:200:dff:fff1:216:3eff:fea4:f9e9: icmp_seq=1 hl=48 time=309 ms
>
>Anyone an idea?
>Should I write a patch or is there a special reason for this?

Sorry, to late! You will break scripts/programms that parse ping6.

Hagen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html