[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACPM=kVKm1xYnBGJ_-ABaBkLcSApnixagQhqmgi89OfCTn5ktQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 05:41:49 +0100
From: Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gurligebis@...too.org>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, rl@...lgate.ch,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/7] via-rhine: factor out tx_thresh handling
2012/1/7 Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>:
> Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-rhine.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-rhine.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-rhine.c
> index 5c4983b..93987e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-rhine.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-rhine.c
> @@ -657,6 +657,16 @@ static void rhine_poll(struct net_device *dev)
> }
> #endif
>
> +static void rhine_kick_tx_threshold(struct rhine_private *rp)
> +{
> + if (rp->tx_thresh < 0xe0) {
> + void __iomem *ioaddr = rp->base;
> +
> + rp->tx_thresh += 0x20;
> + BYTE_REG_BITS_SET(rp->tx_thresh, 0x80, ioaddr + TxConfig);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int rhine_napipoll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> {
> struct rhine_private *rp = container_of(napi, struct rhine_private, napi);
> @@ -1910,8 +1920,7 @@ static void rhine_error(struct net_device *dev, int intr_status)
> intr_status);
> }
> if (intr_status & IntrTxUnderrun) {
> - if (rp->tx_thresh < 0xE0)
> - BYTE_REG_BITS_SET((rp->tx_thresh += 0x20), 0x80, ioaddr + TxConfig);
> + rhine_kick_tx_threshold(rp);
> if (debug > 1)
> netdev_info(dev, "Transmitter underrun, Tx threshold now %02x\n",
> rp->tx_thresh);
> @@ -1923,9 +1932,7 @@ static void rhine_error(struct net_device *dev, int intr_status)
> if ((intr_status & IntrTxError) &&
> (intr_status & (IntrTxAborted |
> IntrTxUnderrun | IntrTxDescRace)) == 0) {
> - if (rp->tx_thresh < 0xE0) {
> - BYTE_REG_BITS_SET((rp->tx_thresh += 0x20), 0x80, ioaddr + TxConfig);
> - }
> + rhine_kick_tx_threshold(rp);
> if (debug > 1)
> netdev_info(dev, "Unspecified error. Tx threshold now %02x\n",
> rp->tx_thresh);
> --
> 1.7.6.4
>
Still net-next, or should they be applied on top of mainline 3.2? :)
/Bjarke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists