[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1326303963.19024.1.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:46:03 -0500
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
To: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
Cc: "linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...allels.com>,
"neilb@...e.de" <neilb@...e.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
"bfields@...ldses.org" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"devel@...nvz.org" <devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] NFS: create blocklayout pipe per network namesapce
context
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 21:23 +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> I've sent rebased "v2" of the patch set, contains updated patch "SUNRPC: handle
> RPC client pipefs dentries by network namespace aware routine", which, I
> believe, fixes oops, spotted by Bryan (it was caused by excessive call of
> rpc_put_mount() on PipeFS dentries unlink).
> So, if I'm not mistaken here, there's no need in implementing of dummy versions
> of rpc_pipefs_notifier_(un)register() or any other dummy stuff.
OK. Fair enough. We'll give it some testing to make sure that we don't
hit it again...
> BTW, it looks like that in last 2 days I've sent all updates to the issues you
> pointed out. If not, please, ping me once more.
I'm in the process of reviewing it right now.
Cheers
Trond
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer
NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@...app.com
www.netapp.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists