[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzkCXnHfF_TO5M+gaN4RMvj_WNuW_QeBezuYBdWnwPDpg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:13:55 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>,
Alwin Beukers <alwin@...adcom.com>,
Roland Vossen <rvossen@...adcom.com>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@...adcom.com>,
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Subject: Re: brcm80211 breakage..
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> The code in v3.2 also used to support srom rev < 4, the new code
> doesn't seem to do that.
I ended up trying to bisect this, and seem to have been successful.
The problem came in not with the BCMA use, but with commit
888153b3db3f ("brcm80211: smac: avoid sprom endianess conversions for
crc8 check")
I haven't yet tried to revert this on top of the current tree, but I'm
pretty sure about the bisection. That commit changes things to be read
a byte at a time, but it *also* removes the old code that only read
SROM_WORDS from the SROM.
Might the apple parts have different SROM contents? I assume "SROM" is
just a serial rom, which may be external and contain things like the ?
All the BCMA changes make the revert somewhat non-trivial, could
somebody who knows the code better please try to do it for me? It
doesn't look complicated, and I can try to do it myself tomorrow if
nobody else steps up, but I'd *really* prefer the guilty parties
themselves to do it, ok?
Arend - it's your commit...
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists