netdev - Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/6] netback: switch to NAPI + kthread model

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F107625.7090601@citrix.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:21:25 +0000
From:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To:	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
CC:	<ian.campbell@...rix.com>, <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	<xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/6] netback: switch to NAPI + kthread
 model

On 13/01/12 16:59, Wei Liu wrote:
> This patch implements 1:1 model netback. We utilizes NAPI and kthread
> to do the weight-lifting job:
> 
>   - NAPI is used for guest side TX (host side RX)
>   - kthread is used for guest side RX (host side TX)
> 
> This model provides better scheduling fairness among vifs. It also
> lays the foundation for future work.
> 
> The major defect for the current implementation is that in the NAPI
> poll handler we don't actually disable interrupt. Xen stuff is
> different from real hardware, it requires some other tuning of ring
> macros.

RING_FINAL_CHECK_FOR_REQUESTS() looks it does the correct thing to me.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html