[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACna6rypt6ocF2ysyDMeCFsBXye24sTTEvRi63hiosUDVGS_RQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:03:17 +0100
From: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
Alwin Beukers <alwin@...adcom.com>,
Roland Vossen <rvossen@...adcom.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [0/5] bcma/brcmsmac suspend/resume cleanups and fixes
W dniu 13 stycznia 2012 08:59 użytkownik Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> napisał:
>
> So here are five cleanup/fix patches that try to make the bcma and
> brcmsmac suspend/resume situation look better.
>
> The changes do:
>
> - use the modern PCI suspend/resume model, and let the PCI layer handle
> the actual standard power state changes.
>
> - clean up the BCMA suspend/resume infrastructure a bit in general.
>
> - actually hook the BCMA suspend/resume callbacks up to the
> suspend/resume event - it use to be that a bcma driver could set its
> suspend/resume routines, but nothing would ever call them.
>
> - and Rafał's bcma window invalidation
>
> Comments? This gets suspend/resume working for me at least once. I'm not
> going to try to hang my machine again until after I have gotten this sent
> out.
>
> Does this work for others?
I have Asus netbook with BCM4313 since a week, so I'll able to test
this. Just give me a day when I'm back home.
Could we rearrange order of patches to make
bcma: invalidate the mapped window over suspend/resume
this first one and add stable as CC? What do you think about this?
--
Rafał
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists