[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwPT2CZ8AXLwKBvBLKT4RFyAjbniuOJ83_nFMCU58hgXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 08:15:21 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
Alwin Beukers <alwin@...adcom.com>,
Roland Vossen <rvossen@...adcom.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [0/5] bcma/brcmsmac suspend/resume cleanups and fixes
2012/1/13 Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>:
>
> I have Asus netbook with BCM4313 since a week, so I'll able to test
> this. Just give me a day when I'm back home.
>
> Could we rearrange order of patches to make
> bcma: invalidate the mapped window over suspend/resume
> this first one and add stable as CC? What do you think about this?
I don't think it is relevant for stable - partly because in stable the
bcma suspend/resume isn't wired up anyway, but mostly because if that
patch really wants to make it into stable, it really is a different
patch than the one I munged it into. The stable bcma doesn't have
bcma_bus_suspend() at all, so it goes into that pci-specific one like
your original email had it, where it's a complete hack.
Does it fix anything in stable?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists