[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120114182737.GB4207@p183.telecom.by>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 21:27:37 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
ken@...elabs.ch, Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, security@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] sha512: make it work, undo percpu message schedule
commit f9e2bca6c22d75a289a349f869701214d63b5060
aka "crypto: sha512 - Move message schedule W[80] to static percpu area"
created global message schedule area.
If sha512_update will ever be entered twice, hash will be silently
calculated incorrectly.
Probably the easiest way to notice incorrect hashes being calculated is
to run 2 ping floods over AH with hmac(sha512):
#!/usr/sbin/setkey -f
flush;
spdflush;
add IP1 IP2 ah 25 -A hmac-sha512 0x00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000025;
add IP2 IP1 ah 52 -A hmac-sha512 0x00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000052;
spdadd IP1 IP2 any -P out ipsec ah/transport//require;
spdadd IP2 IP1 any -P in ipsec ah/transport//require;
XfrmInStateProtoError will start ticking with -EBADMSG being returned
from ah_input(). This never happens with, say, hmac(sha1).
With patch applied (on BOTH sides), XfrmInStateProtoError does not tick
with multiple bidirectional ping flood streams like it doesn't tick
with SHA-1.
After this patch sha512_transform() will start using ~750 bytes of stack on x86_64.
This is OK for simple loads, for something more heavy, stack reduction will be done
separatedly.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
---
crypto/sha512_generic.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/crypto/sha512_generic.c
+++ b/crypto/sha512_generic.c
@@ -21,8 +21,6 @@
#include <linux/percpu.h>
#include <asm/byteorder.h>
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64[80], msg_schedule);
-
static inline u64 Ch(u64 x, u64 y, u64 z)
{
return z ^ (x & (y ^ z));
@@ -89,7 +87,7 @@ sha512_transform(u64 *state, const u8 *input)
u64 a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, t1, t2;
int i;
- u64 *W = get_cpu_var(msg_schedule);
+ u64 W[80];
/* load the input */
for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
@@ -128,8 +126,6 @@ sha512_transform(u64 *state, const u8 *input)
/* erase our data */
a = b = c = d = e = f = g = h = t1 = t2 = 0;
- memset(W, 0, sizeof(__get_cpu_var(msg_schedule)));
- put_cpu_var(msg_schedule);
}
static int
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists