[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxfKyqm9eC_XajLYJ6D5YhHn_9K0pkG+caZDhxrAwvA0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:52:11 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
ken@...elabs.ch, Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
security@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sha512: make it work, undo percpu message schedule
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
> This is too risky, and we provided an alternate patch, not just for fun.
Did you see the second patch?
The one that got rid of the *stupid* 80-entry array?
I don't know why so many sha implementations do that idiotic full
array, when the circular one is much better.
In fact, the 16-entry circular array allows machines with lots of
registers to keep all the state in registers and the C implementation
can often be as good as hand-tuned assembly. At least that's true for
sha1, I'm not sure you can do the same with sha512.
But that actually *requires* that the 16-entry array be done on the
stack as an automatic array. Anything else, and the compiler won't be
able to do it.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists