[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVxJT_+YZhK2oMU+iDKi_t_rMTarzrTh34Jqi1gPMicyf4=rw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:20:47 +0200
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
ken@...elabs.ch, Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, security@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sha512: reduce stack usage to safe number
On 1/16/12, David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
> Doesn't this badly overflow W[] ..
>
>> +#define SHA512_0_15(i, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h) \
>> + t1 = h + e1(e) + Ch(e, f, g) + sha512_K[i] + W[i]; \
> ...
>> + for (i = 0; i < 16; i += 8) {
> ...
>> + SHA512_0_15(i + 7, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, a);
>> + }
No, why should it?
i can be only 0 and 8.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists