[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F13D376.7020500@parallels.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:36:22 +0400
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net
tree related)
On 01/09/2012 10:52 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Stephen Rothwell<sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:38:12 +1100
>
>> I applied the following patch for today:
>>
>> From: Stephen Rothwell<sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
>> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:33:16 +1100
>> Subject: [PATCH] net: sk_update_clone is only used in net/core/sock.c
>>
>> so move it there. Fixes build errors when CONFIG_INET is not defeined:
>>
>> In file included from include/linux/tcp.h:211:0,
>> from include/linux/ipv6.h:221,
>> from include/net/ipv6.h:16,
>> from include/linux/sunrpc/clnt.h:26,
>> from include/linux/nfs_fs.h:50,
>> from init/do_mounts.c:20:
>> include/net/sock.h: In function 'sk_update_clone':
>> include/net/sock.h:1109:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'sock_update_memcg' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell<sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
>
> Applied, thanks Stephen.
This is not the proper fix.
Although it can stay for a matter of style if you guys prefer the inline
function definition to live in sock.c since no one else uses it.
I'll send a patch to fix this, that can live ontop of yours, shortly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists