[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1326895569.2316.14.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:06:09 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Tore Anderson <tore@....no>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ipv6: dst_allfrag() not taken into account by TCP
Le mercredi 18 janvier 2012 à 13:42 +0100, Tore Anderson a écrit :
> * Eric Dumazet
>
> > Could you please test following patch ?
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems to work fine, now all the outgoing packets that includes a
> Fragmentation header all are "atomic" or "non-fragmented" fragments,
> i.e., that they both have Offset=0 and More Fragments=0.
>
> I'm uploaded a tcpdump showing the traffic with the patch here:
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=72106
>
> Best regards,
Seems good, thanks !
Now I wonder if some RFC can allow us to send small frames without a
frag header, since this frag header forces us to perform tx checksum in
software.
I guess 576 should be safe ?
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
index d97e071..14cb938 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static int ip6_finish_output2(struct sk_buff *skb)
static int ip6_finish_output(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
if ((skb->len > ip6_skb_dst_mtu(skb) && !skb_is_gso(skb)) ||
- dst_allfrag(skb_dst(skb)))
+ (skb->len > 576 && dst_allfrag(skb_dst(skb))))
return ip6_fragment(skb, ip6_finish_output2);
else
return ip6_finish_output2(skb);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists