[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2E1EB2CF9ED1CB4AA966F0EB76EAB4430CE01EE4@SACMVEXC2-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 07:34:02 -0800
From: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
To: "Stanislav Kinsbursky" <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
Cc: "Dr James Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>,
<linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"Pavel Emelianov" <xemul@...allels.com>, <neilb@...e.de>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"James Bottomley" <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
<bfields@...ldses.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/5] SUNRPC: make caches network namespace aware
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stanislav Kinsbursky [mailto:skinsbursky@...allels.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 10:32 AM
> To: Myklebust, Trond
> Cc: Dr James Bruce Fields; linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org; Pavel Emelianov;
> neilb@...e.de; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> James Bottomley; bfields@...ldses.org; davem@...emloft.net;
> devel@...nvz.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUNRPC: make caches network namespace aware
>
> 19.01.2012 19:19, Trond Myklebust пишет:
> > On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 18:48 +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> >> One more step towards to "NFS in container".
> >> With this patch set caches are allocated per network namespace.
> >>
> >> The following series consists of:
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Stanislav Kinsbursky (5):
> >> SUNRPC: cache creation and destruction routines introduced
> >> SUNRPC: create unix gid cache per network namespace
> >> SUNRPC: create GSS auth cache per network namespace
> >> SUNRPC: ip map cache per network namespace cleanup
> >> SUNRPC: generic cache register routines removed
> >
> > The patches look good, and I've applied them for now in my 'devel'
> > branch so we can test them, but I'd like to get an Ack/Nack from Bruce
> > before committing to merging them.
> >
>
> Cool, thanks.
> BTW, these patches depends on patch "NFSd: use network-namespace-
> aware cache registering routines", which Bruce took already (and it's even in
> linux-next already), but not in your devel tree for some reason.
In that case, would it make more sense to carry them in Bruce's tree?
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer
NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@...app.com
www.netapp.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists