[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F184E70.5070902@parallels.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:10:08 +0400
From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
CC: "Trond.Myklebust@...app.com" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...allels.com>,
"neilb@...e.de" <neilb@...e.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"devel@...nvz.org" <devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] SUNRPC: ip map cache per network namespace cleanup
19.01.2012 20:37, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 06:49:31PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>> This patch converts ip_map_cache per network namespace implemenetation to the
>> same view, as other caches done in the series.
>> Besides generalization, code becomes shorter with this patch.
>
> Again, isnt' it ip_map_cache, and not one of the dynamically created
> cache details, that's being passed to the lookup routines?
>
> I may just be confused....
>
Nope. ip_map_cache was made per network namespace a long time ago.
But it was done in other way: no static templates - just allocation and
initialization.
But static template looks clearer to me. So I've used this approach for other
caches. And decided to update ip_map_cache management in the same way.
--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists