lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1327040190.4826.7.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jan 2012 07:16:30 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Bradley Peterson <despite@...il.com>
Cc:	paulus@...ba.org, linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Single core gets pegged on multi-core PPTP server

Le jeudi 19 janvier 2012 à 16:35 -0600, Bradley Peterson a écrit :
> Hello,
> 
> I am trying to test the capacity of a linux PPTP server, both in
> number of connections, and in packets per second.  I am using kernel
> 2.6.38.8, with the ppp, pptp, and gre modules, and accel-pptp 0.8.3.
> I have RPS, RFS, and XPS enabled on the network devices for SMP
> support.
> 
> But I'm seeing one CPU get pegged out with soft interrupt, while the
> others are almost completely idle.
> 
> In my current test, I'm starting 250 pptp connections from another
> server, then running iperf across each connection.  The client machine
> pegs out, sure, but I'm surprised the server pegs out a single CPU.
> With RPS, I would expect softirq's to be more balanced.
> 
> Where could the bottleneck be?  Do all ppp packets need to be
> processed serially?
> 

Hmmm, you need a more recent kernel or backport commit 
c6865cb3cc6f3c2857fa4c6f5fda2945d70b1e84
    rps: Inspect GRE encapsulated packets to get flow hash
    
    Crack open GRE packets in __skb_get_rxhash to compute 4-tuple hash on
    in encapsulated packet.  Note that this is used only when the
    __skb_get_rxhash is taken, in particular only when the device does
    not compute provide the rxhash (ie. feature is disabled).
    
    This was tested by creating a single GRE tunnel between two 16 core
    AMD machines.  200 netperf TCP_RR streams were ran with 1 byte
    request and response size.
    
    Without patch: 157497 tps, 50/90/99% latencies 1250/1292/1364 usecs
    With patch: 325896 tps, 50/90/99% latencies 603/848/1169
    
    Signed-off-by: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>



And make sure you disabled hardware rxhash (if your NIC provides it)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ