[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1327021934.2707.10.camel@jtkirshe-mobl>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:12:14 -0800
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: jdb@...x.dk
Cc: "e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
"Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet@...rsen.dk>,
"Skidmore, Donald C" <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>,
"Fujinaka, Todd" <todd.fujinaka@...el.com>,
David Lamparter <equinox@...c24.net>,
Robert Bays <robert@...julf.net>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ixgbe: Module param "allow_any_sfp" for allowing
unsupported SFP+ modules
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 15:46 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> Intel are limiting which SFP's can use in their NICs, due to support
> issues.
> This restriction comes from an EEPROM setting
> IXGBE_DEVICE_CAPS_ALLOW_ANY_SFP.
> This is for example the case with the 10Gbit/s X520-DA2 NIC.
>
> Add a module param "allow_any_sfp", which can override the EEPROM
> setting, and allows any unsupported SFP+ module to be used. When
> doing so, print disclaimer of unsupported usage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...x.dk>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_phy.c | 23
> ++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Thanks Jesper, I will add it to me queue of patches.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists