[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120122114746.GC27222@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:47:46 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: rusty@...tcorp.com.au, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix typos of memory barriers
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 04:16:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Good catch.
Note: this fixes a bug introduced by
7b21e34fd1c272e3a8c3846168f2f6287a4cd72b.
It's probably a good idea to mention
this is the commit log.
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 79e1b29..78428a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
> #define virtio_rmb(vq) \
> do { if ((vq)->weak_barriers) smp_rmb(); else rmb(); } while(0)
> #define virtio_wmb(vq) \
> - do { if ((vq)->weak_barriers) smp_rmb(); else rmb(); } while(0)
> + do { if ((vq)->weak_barriers) smp_wmb(); else wmb(); } while(0)
> #else
> /* We must force memory ordering even if guest is UP since host could be
> * running on another CPU, but SMP barriers are defined to barrier() in that
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists