[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201201230758.55200.hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:58:54 +0100
From: Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@...csson.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"equinox@...c24.net" <equinox@...c24.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC Hanging clean-up of a namespace
On Monday 23 January 2012 07:25:52 Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@...csson.com> writes:
>
> > On Friday 20 January 2012 21:55:27 Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> My current hypothesis is that the namespace actually didn't get freed
> >> until the tcp socket finished closing. You can check by looking at when
> >> __put_net and then cleanup_net are called.
> >
> > __put_net() is called just after tcp_write_timer() fires and then
> > cleanup_net()
>
> Hypothesis confirmed. Your speed problem is that it is taking 2 minutes
> in the pathological case for your tcp socket to close.
>
> Do you have any clue why it is taking your sockets so long to close?
> Is the other side simply not responding?
>
The root cause of death is that the other side (init_net namespace) dies first
and when it dies all containers will be killed ...
/Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists