[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+Dx6HZK2ns94pG79FfPZpVO9+QY8LQ00zFyeK5zZjc6HLq-cQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 03:00:12 +0530
From: "Pradeep A. Dalvi" <netdev@...deepdalvi.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RESEND net 5/5][NON-TRIVIAL] drivers/net/ethernet:
dev_alloc_skb to netdev_alloc_skb
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> Le mardi 24 janvier 2012 à 02:24 +0530, Pradeep A. Dalvi a écrit :
>> Replaced deprecating dev_alloc_skb with netdev_alloc_skb in drivers/net/ethernet
>> - Removed extra skb->dev = dev after netdev_alloc_skb
>>
>
>
>>
>> /* Initialize the LANCE Rx and Tx rings. */
>> static void
>> -lance_init_ring(struct net_device *dev, gfp_t gfp)
>> +lance_init_ring(struct net_device *dev)
>> {
>> struct lance_private *lp = dev->ml_priv;
>> int i;
>> @@ -871,13 +871,12 @@ lance_init_ring(struct net_device *dev, gfp_t gfp)
>> struct sk_buff *skb;
>> void *rx_buff;
>>
>> - skb = alloc_skb(PKT_BUF_SZ, GFP_DMA | gfp);
>> + skb = netdev_alloc_skb(dev, PKT_BUF_SZ);
>> lp->rx_skbuff[i] = skb;
>> - if (skb) {
>> - skb->dev = dev;
>> + if (skb)
>> rx_buff = skb->data;
>> - } else
>> - rx_buff = kmalloc(PKT_BUF_SZ, GFP_DMA | gfp);
>> + else
>> + rx_buff = kmalloc(PKT_BUF_SZ, GFP_DMA | GFP_AUTOMIC);
>> if (rx_buff == NULL)
>> lp->rx_ring[i].base = 0;
>> else
>
> Thats really crap, please dont send us such patches, not even compiled.
>
> alloc_skb() has nothing to do with dev_alloc_skb(), and there is a
> reason GFP_DMA is used in this driver.
Would drop these changes and resubmit the patch. Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists