[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B6E3F@saturn3.aculab.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:44:10 -0000
From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: "Andrea Shepard" <andrea@...sephoneslair.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: <khc@...waw.pl>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <mmarek@...e.cz>,
<jkosina@...e.cz>, <joe@...ches.com>, <justinmattock@...il.com>,
<gregkh@...e.de>, <alan@...ux.intel.com>, <jdmason@...zu.us>
Subject: RE: [07/22] Cyclades PC300 driver: ioctl() fixes for mixed 64/32-bit systems
> +struct pc300_net_stats {
> + u64 rx_packets;
...
> + u64 rx_compressed;
> + u64 tx_compressed;
> +};
> +
> typedef struct pc300stats {
> int hw_type;
> u32 line_on;
> u32 line_off;
> - struct net_device_stats gen_stats;
> + /* Use this instead of net_device_stats, since passing
> + * net_device_stats breaks 32-bit user processes on
> 64-bit kernels,
> + * and rtnetlink is unreasonably complicated just to get
> + * some statistics.
> + */
> + struct pc300_net_stats net_stats;
> falc_t te_stats;
> } pc300stats_t;
Since 'struct net_device_stats' looks like a common structure,
maybe the 64bit version should be added in the same place??
...
> +struct pc300hw_user {
> + int type; /* RSV, X21, etc. */
> + int bus; /* Bus (PCI, PMC, etc.) */
> + int nchan; /* number of channels */
> + int irq; /* interrupt request level */
> + u32 clock; /* Board clock */
> + u8 cpld_id; /* CPLD ID (TE only) */
> + u16 cpld_reg1; /* CPLD reg 1 (TE only) */
You should probably make all the fields fixed sized types and
ensure there is no implicit padding added between fields.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists