[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F26AC51.8080108@6wind.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:42:25 +0100
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: fix RFC5722 comment
Le 30/01/2012 15:29, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> RFC5722 Section 4 was amended by Errata 3089
>
> Our implementation did the right thing anyway...
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet<eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Cc: Nicolas Dichtel<nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/reassembly.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
> index b69fae7..9447bd6 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
> @@ -336,12 +336,11 @@ static int ip6_frag_queue(struct frag_queue *fq, struct sk_buff *skb,
> }
>
> found:
> - /* RFC5722, Section 4:
> - * When reassembling an IPv6 datagram, if
> + /* RFC5722, Section 4, amended by Errata ID : 3089
> + * When reassembling an IPv6 datagram, if
Identation was an exact copy of the original rfc (not changed by the errata),
but it's a detail ;-)
Regards,
Nicolas
> * one or more its constituent fragments is determined to be an
> * overlapping fragment, the entire datagram (and any constituent
> - * fragments, including those not yet received) MUST be silently
> - * discarded.
> + * fragments) MUST be silently discarded.
> */
>
> /* Check for overlap with preceding fragment. */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists