netdev - Re: [PATCH 22/29] sysctl: Stop requiring explicit management of sysctl directories

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m162fsbhv5.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date:	Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:45:02 -0800
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Damien Millescamps <damien.millescamps@...nd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/29] sysctl: Stop requiring explicit management of sysctl directories

Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@...il.com> writes:

>
> Why do you only check the given @set after creating the new dir. Why
> not the parent dir too?

That is a race and a minor bug.  Somehow I had convinced myself that
either it didn't matter or that it would be hard to deal with, but
that doesn't hold up.  Oops.  Thankfully the final version using links
does not have this race/bug. 

Eric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html