[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <loom.20120131T103325-267@post.gmane.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:38:33 +0000 (UTC)
From: augusto <augusto@...scend.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Introducing open source MSTP daemon
Vitalii Demianets <vitas <at> nppfactor.kiev.ua> writes:
>
> On Thursday 22 September 2011 19:39:40 David Lamparter wrote:
> >
> > I assume it works with current Linux kernel bridge code on a RSTP level?
> > The code looks considerably more maintainable than rstpd :) - I will try
> > running it later!
> >
>
> Ok, now it works with kernel bridge code and you can evaluate it.
>
> mstpd sends all the state changes in the CIST to the kernel bridge, so it
> works for the (R)STP cases as expected. Checked it by connecting two bridges:
> one running mstpd and another running rstpd and in-kernel stp. In both cases
> mstpd code behaves reasonably. Not checked in more complex setups though.
>
> Also mstpd translates to the bridge code fdb flushing events and changes
> ageing time (for the rapid ageing case).
>
Hi Vitalii,
Thanks for your work.
I am trying to implement your solution on an embedded system, but I dont have a
clear idea of how to use it.
My scenario is like this:
eth0.2 and eth1.2 belong to br1
eth0.4 and eth3.4 belong to br2
eth1.5 and eth3.5 belong to br3
I added br1 br2 and br3 to bridge-stp.
What steps should I take now?
Thanks for your help
Augusto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists