lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 02:07:38 -0500 (EST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: lizf@...fujitsu.com Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...driver.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] netprio_cgroup: use IS_ENABLED() and family From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:06:53 +0800 > 14:59, David Miller wrote: >> >> Do not mix genuine bug fixes and cleanups. >> >> Otherwise I cannot apply your bug fixes to the 'net' tree. >> >> Seperate things out, submit only pure bug fixes first, then >> later once those changes propagate you can submit the cleanups. >> > > I did seperate them out, so the first three patches are fixes, > and others are cleanups. I can resend cleanup patches once > fixes hit mainline. Seperate them in different groups, don't submit them as one collection. And definitely don't submit them all at the same damn time! You have to wait with the dependent cleanups until the fixes go in, and subsequently show up in my net-next tree. I'm not applying this stuff until you submit it properly, in two stages. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists