netdev - Re: [PATCH 4/6] netprio_cgroup: use IS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F28E853.7000104@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:22:59 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] netprio_cgroup: use IS_ENABLED() and family

>>> Do not mix genuine bug fixes and cleanups.
>>>
>>> Otherwise I cannot apply your bug fixes to the 'net' tree.
>>>
>>> Seperate things out, submit only pure bug fixes first, then
>>> later once those changes propagate you can submit the cleanups.
>>>
>>
>> I did seperate them out, so the first three patches are fixes,
>> and others are cleanups. I can resend cleanup patches once
>> fixes hit mainline.
> 
> Seperate them in different groups, don't submit them as one
> collection.  And definitely don't submit them all at the
> same damn time!  You have to wait with the dependent cleanups
> until the fixes go in, and subsequently show up in my net-next
> tree.
> 
> I'm not applying this stuff until you submit it properly, in
> two stages.
> 

I'll do this when I get some comments/acks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html