[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1328101484.2595.17.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:04:44 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Leonardo Uzcudun <uzcudunl@...oo.it>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: VLAN 1 - Native
Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 11:24 +0000, Leonardo Uzcudun a écrit :
> ________________________________
> Da: Leonardo Uzcudun <uzcudunl@...oo.it>
> A: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
> Inviato: Mercoledì 1 Febbraio 2012 12:22
> Oggetto: VLAN 1 - Native
>
> Hello:
>
> I'm connecting my Linux computer (debian 2.6.32-5) to a switch to
> implement vlans.
>
> All is working fine except for the VLAN 1. Of sure you are aware of
> this situation and i would like to knoe if there is any parameter or
> setting that i should set in the vlan (linux side, not switch)
> configuration. Here's my configuration:
> ip addr add 0.0.0.0 dev eth0
> ip link set eth0 up
> ip link add link eth0 name eth0.1 type vlan id 1
> ip link add link eth0 name eth0.101 type vlan id 101
> ip addr add 0.0.0.0 dev eth0.1
> ip addr add 0.0.0.0 dev eth0.101
> ip link set eth0.101 up
> ip link set eth0.1 up
> brctl addbr br_vlan_1
> brctl addbr br_vlan_101
> brctl addif br_vlan_1 eth0.1
> brctl addif br_vlan_101 eth0.101
> ip addr add 0.0.0.0 dev br_vlan_1
> ip
> addr add 0.0.0.0 dev br_vlan_101
> ip link set br_vlan_1 up
> ip link set br_vlan_101 up
>
> Traffic on vlan 101 is working fine. Traffic on VLAN 1 is not working
> cause the packets are going out from eth0 like tagged. How could i set
> the VID 1 as untagged?
What do you mean by "sending packets for VID 1, untagged " ?
What is the difference between vlan 101 and vlan 1 ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists