netdev - Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000000000002c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120203004228.GA23429@kroah.com>
Date:	Thu, 2 Feb 2012 16:42:28 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	s.priebe@...fihost.ag, jwboyer@...il.com, hch@...radead.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, david@...morbit.com,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...e.de
Subject: Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
 000000000000002c

On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 02:39:57PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:04:15 +0100
> 
> > David, what do you think ?
> 
> I frankly don't care at this point.
> 
> The only reasonable thing is if someone can successfully do the
> backport, but if that's not possible there really isn't anything
> reasonable we can do, all the other options have fatal negative
> consequences which make them completely untenable.

I agree.  I'm pretty sure the distros basing their releases on 3.0 are
aware of this issue, so perhaps someone could dig through those tree and
see how they resolved this issue, if at all.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html