netdev - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netfront: correct MAX_TX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F2BD2CC.4050906@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:27:56 +0100
From:	Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...hat.com>
To:	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
CC:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"jeremy@...p.org" <jeremy@...p.org>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netfront: correct MAX_TX_TARGET	calculation.

On 01/27/12 11:36, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 18:19 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 05:23:23PM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
>>
>> Can you give some more details please? What is the impact of
>> not having this? Should it be backported to stable?
>>
>
> I think it will not cause crash, only the scratch space size is
> affected, thus impacting tx batching a bit.
>
> As the tx structure is bigger than rx structure. I think scratch space
> size is likely to shrink after correction.

It also seems to affect the netfront_tx_slot_available() function, 
making it stricter (likely). Before the patch, the function may have 
reported available slots when there were none, causing spurious(?) queue 
wakeups in xennet_maybe_wake_tx(), and not stopping the queue in 
xennet_start_xmit() when it should have(?).

It seems there are no further uses of TX_MAX_TARGET, and for bounds 
checking NET_TX_RING_SIZE was used (which was always correct). So I 
guess the typo may have caused some performance degradation.

I can't either prove or disprove a DoS-like busy loop in the pre-patch form.

Laszlo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html