netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] Implement IPV6_UNICAST

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEU2+vqBrkh0Wab9r3PAVAWTiTGC7NwW_Nh862izCsyipPzd_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 6 Feb 2012 20:23:53 -0700
From:	"Erich E. Hoover" <ehoover@...es.edu>
To:	Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
Cc:	Linux Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] Implement IPV6_UNICAST_IF socket option.

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com> wrote:
> On 02/06/2012 05:11 PM, Erich E. Hoover wrote:
>> ...
>> I'll double check all of these tonight, but a cursory look seems to
>> indicate that the multicast check is the right place to put this for
>> all the files.  I'm sorry about that, I clearly didn't consider
>> interfering with multicast.
>
> It's probably important to keep the precedence the same as before:
>
>        SO_BINDTODEVICE
>        IPV6_PKTINFO
>        IPV6_*CAST_IF
> ...

I agree, I mean that the IP*_MULTICAST_IF location appears to be the
correct place to put IP*_UNICAST_IF.  I'll post a revision after I've
had a chance to test it.

Erich Hoover
ehoover@...es.edu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html