netdev - Re: network regression: cannot rename netdev twice

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <14373.1328683324@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:42:04 -0500
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ML netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: network regression: cannot rename netdev twice

On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:50:15 +0100, Kay Sievers said:

> After years of working in that area I will stop to work on these hacks
> to promise stable ethX names. It was just wrong, like enumerations
> always are in hotplug setups.

So (real world case) I've got a server that's got a 1G ethernet connected to
the public net, a 1G ethernet that's a cluster management network, and
a 10G ethernet that connects to our HPC clusters.

And I want to add iptables rules that distinguish based on interface. Currently
I can nail the management net to eth0, the public net to eth1, and the 10G to
eth2, and then just add "-i eth1" or whatever in the iptables ruleset.

I really don't care if the 0/1/2 move around - but if we're not having nailed-down
interface names, what will take the place of '-i ethN' in iptables?

> People who need predictable interface names should just manually
> configure custom/descriptive names, or names which are reliably
> derived from the hardware, like firmware-provided names or the pci
> slot number.

Or is this sort of thing in /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="00:25:90:0b:f2:80", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0"
what you are trying to move to, and my systems are already onboard and
I should just move along, nothing to see here? ;)

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped