netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/5] send-crc: Add framework to allow sending packets with customized CRC.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F329AF2.3010202@candelatech.com>
Date:	Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:55:30 -0800
From:	Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To:	jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
CC:	Jeff Kirsher <tarbal@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] send-crc: Add framework to allow sending packets
 with customized CRC.

On 02/08/2012 12:02 AM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On 02/07/2012 11:49 AM, greearb@...delatech.com wrote:
>> From: Ben Greear<greearb@...delatech.com>
>>
>> This is useful for testing RX handling of frames with bad
>> CRCs.
>>
>> Requires driver support to actually put the packet on the
>> wire properly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Greear<greearb@...delatech.com>
> Ben-
>
> I tried to apply this series to Dave's net-next tree and I stopped after
> the first two patches did not apply cleanly.
>
> What tree did you use to generate this patch series?

I was using net-next from a few days ago...I'll rebase later today to
make sure everything is up to date and re-post.

Oh, that set is on top of the first two patches that enable rx-crc
infrastructure and e100 support..that might be the issue.

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html