[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120210065031.GK23142@secunet.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:50:31 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: timo.teras@....fi, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix routing metrics
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 01:40:10PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
> >
> > Hm, I still don't get your point. Could you specify this please?
> >
> > When a route cache entry is created and the peer_genid does not match
> > the genid on the inetpeer, fresh inetpeer metrics are allocated and
> > then published. After that, the new metrics are in proper state and
> > ready to use.
>
> Right, which is exactly what you want to happen.
>
> Checking on every metric access is therefore pointless and needless.
>
> The peer_genid only increments when the routing cache is flushed,
> therefore every subsequent access to the metrics will go through the
> route cache entry creation path first, and therefore that will make
> sure fresh inetpeer metrics will be allocated since the peer_genid
> does not match.
I fully agree with you here. But we check for the genid just in
rt_init_metrics() which is invoked only on route cache entry
creation. There is no check when the metrics are accessed,
because the metrics on the inetpeer are valid on every access.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists