[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120210.024033.1496479783120497956.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:40:33 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: peppe.cavallaro@...com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] stmmac: fix driver features
From: Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:08:54 +0100
> Hello David
>
> On 2/9/2012 9:35 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> This is not the purpose of the fix_features method, it's meant to
>> ensure that the settings are valid.
>>
>> It's not meant to "catch up" with settings you store in the internal
>> datastructures of your driver.
>>
>> You need to do this at probe time, where the initial ->hw_features
>> and ->features values are set.
>
> Initially the driver HW features are indeed set in the probe but in the
> stmmac_open function, after looking at the HW cap reg, some parameters,
> for example the HW csum, can be overridden and the
> netdev_update_features is called. IIUC the netdev_update_features calls
> the driver's ndo_fix_features. For this reason I improved the
> stmmac_fix_feature function to cover more setting. Anyway, if I cannot
> use this function I should move from the open to the probe the logic to
> manage the MAC identification and HW cap register. What do you suggest?
You should not be determining chip features in your open method,
such work belongs in your device probe.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists