| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <201202132300.27736.florian@openwrt.org> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:00:27 +0100 From: Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] NET: PHY names vs MDIO bus names regression fixes Le lundi 13 février 2012 22:02:04, David Miller a écrit : > From: Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org> > Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:23:19 +0100 > > > This patch serie aims at fixing the regressions introduced with the > > "use an unique MDIO bus name" patchset. Some drivers still formatted > > the PHY id to use the old bus name (e.g: "0" or "1") and therefore > > the PHY probing logic gets broken because their underlying MDIO bus > > name was changed too from "0" to <foo>-<id>. > > > > The offending patches got introduced during 3.3-rc1. > > Then why the heck are you CC:'ing -stable on these patches? There was no reason, just some bad habit. > > We're still in the 3.3-rcX phase, so there is no other tree in > the world these patches should be applied to. > > In any event, for networking stuff, you shouldn't be adding > the stable CC: anyways, I take care of all networking stable > submissions myself. Allright, do you want me to resend these without the CC or are they okay as is? -- Florian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists