[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1329141272.9867.4.camel@mojatatu>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:54:31 -0500
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
bhutchings@...arflare.com, roprabhu@...co.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com, chrisw@...hat.com,
davem@...emloft.net, gregory.v.rose@...el.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
sri@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v0 1/2] net: bridge: propagate FDB table into
hardware
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 08:39 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Some related discussion points:
> * the bridge needs to support control from both userspace (MSTP, TRILL, ...)
> and kernel space (offload etc)
I think all are pretty much covered if you let some controler (I prefer
user space) ADD/DEL/GET/Event on the fdb
TRILL really is outside the scope of this; from an encap/decap it
probably needs to be YAND (Yet another netdev) and from a control side
of things you need to just provide the above netlink ops(ADD, etC) on
the fdb and let the controller worry about things (Actually you _may_
need to have learning done outside of the kernel for TRILL)
> * the bridge forwarding database is simpler and different than the existing
> neighbor table, don't remember the details but last time I checked it
> using neighbor table in bridge would be putting square peg in round hole.
Agreed.
cheers,
jamal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists