[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1329154666.2697.16.camel@bwh-desktop>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:37:46 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
CC: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <gospo@...hat.com>, <sassmann@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 4/7] ixgbe: Add function for testing status bits in
Rx descriptor
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 09:21 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On 02/11/2012 11:06 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 16:08 -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> >> From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
> >>
> >> This change adds a small function for testing Rx status bits in the
> >> descriptor. The advantage to this is that we can avoid unnecessary
> >> byte swaps on big endian systems.
> > [...]
> >> + /* unmap the sg list when FCPRSP is received */
> >> + case __constant_cpu_to_le32(IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_FCSTAT_FCPRSP):
> > [...]
> >
> > cpu_to_le32() works as a compile-time constant when given a constant
> > argument. You shouldn't need this ugly __constant_ prefix.
> >
> > Ben.
> >
>
> If that is the case then what is the point of even having the
> __constant_ prefixed version of these macros anyway? I ask because I
> know we have had people submit patches in the past replacing htons calls
> with __constant_htons and the like and nobody has ever spoken up before
> to indicate that these were unnecessary.
[...]
Probably for backward-compatibility, as this wasn't true before Linux
2.6.22.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists