[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1329218017.2336.5.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:13:37 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Steffen Klassert <klassert@...hematik.tu-chemnitz.de>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bonding with 3c59x driver
Le mardi 14 février 2012 à 12:06 +0100, Steffen Klassert a écrit :
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:22:10AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> >
> > Well I am still curious why the 3c59x driver has such slow polling when
> > other drivers I have been testing are able to report almost instantly
> > when I remove a network cable. Could it be that other network chips
> > generate an interrupt on cable removal and the 3com chips do not?
> >
>
> Yes, at least some of the supported chips do not generate an interrupt
> on cable removal, so we have to check for this with a timer.
> --
We could have a 5 sec timer in case device is a slave.
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c59x.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c59x.c
index 1282f04..e463d10 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c59x.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c59x.c
@@ -1841,7 +1841,7 @@ vortex_timer(unsigned long data)
ok = 1;
}
- if (!netif_carrier_ok(dev))
+ if (dev->flags & IFF_SLAVE || !netif_carrier_ok(dev))
next_tick = 5*HZ;
if (vp->medialock)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists